When he amends it to suspending immigration and refugees from certain countries, >>>
i disagree mohammedanism/islam is a political system just like globull warming. it’s just you have to be a real believer to accept it’s crap. and it is out to replace our laws with theirs. everyone of the 50% should be shot for sedition.
When he amends it to bar people holding certain ideologies, sure. Of course that will require distinguishing radical from non radical Muslims. We once banned socialists, we can ban those who support radical Islam
covers that. You have to define the ideology, name it, ban it. Sounds like Alinsky, doesn't it, but he wasn't stupid.
The Trump plan, ask them if they're Muslim. I recognize he's not entirely serious from a policy perspective, rather generating publicity, but it's something we've not done since the late 18th, early 19th century, and even then it was about Catholics and Jews voting and holding office, not being allowed in the country.
We'll see, I acknowledge I don't like they way he approached the topic, but as the conversation develops and focuses on the points I raised, my mind could be changed. It's because of Trump's "outrageous" statements bills were introduced in both the House and Senate regarding refugees and Visa waiver, based on country of origin.
The Sharia thing depends on whether or not they're talking about conflict with US law, or religious issues. If, as I suspect, they're talking Sharia above US law, forget it.