Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
Either it will be over-enforced, and we will keep from coming to the US folks we should take,

Yep, and guess what, we don't need to take in immigrants. Some people want to stop all immigration. If we end up taking a lot less immigrants but keeping out most Muslims, then that could be two good things.

The problem with basing it on countries with active terrorism is that you block Christian refugees who need help the most because they're in the midst of the jihad. That's unconscionable. If there's one kind of immigrant we should take it's someone in a peaceful religion who is helplessly under assault from terrorists.

52 posted on 12/08/2015 11:09:32 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Then, the policy should be to reduce or end immigration, period. Then, all these other issues become moot.

But currently, we have, as a nation, a very low birth rate. History has so far been unkind to countries with declining populations.


53 posted on 12/09/2015 12:23:55 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson