Okay...here is take from the weird events TODAY...
The wife proclaimed allegiance to ISIS under a fake name on a FB account;
The Farook family attorney (an infidel no less!) mentions, in an interview, how petite the wife was. 90 lbs (couldn’t lift a gun let alone fire one). Huh? Wouldn’t the witnesses have thought some one so PETITE was a woman when they initial reports came out? Didnt they emphatically say THEEE MALE SHOOTERS?!?
And now, less than 48 hours from the actual crime, one of the crime scenes is opened to a trampling herd of media?
Seriously...we are entering Alex Jones territory.
The woman on the second floor who said she saw one of the gunmen go in said he appeared to be heavyset. Which might be attributable to the vest and accoutrement. But it doesn’t make sense that he would let the woman go in first, if it was just two of them. Maybe, I guess, if she was the original radical out of the two, but it seems odd. Don’t really have anything else to disprove what they’ve said. I could understand mis-witnessing (is that a word?) two vs. three in the midst of an attack. But I find it confusing that a number of people could get it wrong like that who were in the room.
“he Farook family attorney (an infidel no less!) mentions, in an interview, how petite the wife was. 90 lbs (couldnât lift a gun let alone fire one).”
Then who was the 145 pound chick in the read bra with a rifle across her back? She is a bit hard to recognize with all those bullet holes, though.
Or, more likely, under her real name.
I’ve never fired a gun at all, but I’ve heard they make guns with very little recoil nowadays. They’re a bit more expensive, but yes, a 90 lb. weakling could fire one.