[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

Oh puhleease. The man was dressed like a woman. It was his responsibility to make clear that he was not a woman if he was selling sex. It was so clearly fraud that I cannot believe you are okay with it. I think all prostitution is wrong. But this was sexual assault because no consent was given for sex with a man. Clearly, or he would not have reacted as he did.

Don’t pursue it. I’m fine with it not being pursued. I did want to reply. If being a sinner means you deserve whatever crimes others want to commit against you then lets just toss out all laws and live by the rules of the jungle: survival of the fittest.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"Oh puhleease. The man was dressed like a woman. It was his responsibility to make clear that he was not a woman if he was selling sex."

This whole discussion stinks like an ill-kept latrine and has long since descended into the absurd. His (the tranny whore's) responsibility was to stop buying it.

And on the subject of appearances: I agree with what Germaine Greer said --- when was it? 45 years ago? I'm getting old--- the really offensive thing is not that trannies are expected to look and act like women, but that women are expected to look and act like trannies.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Now I'm inadvertently deleting whole sentences unaware. I meant to write, "His (the tranny whore's) responsibilty was so stop selling sex. His (the horny Marine's) responsibility was to stop buying it."

It's like peering at the multiplex writhings of slime-worms and trying to calibrate which was first, and which was worst.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"If being a sinner means you deserve whatever crimes others want to commit against you..."

then the tranny deserved to be murdered. But that, you may notice, is not my position. It is the position of the people I am arguing against, the ones who are defending the homicide as deserved and justified.

May God have mercy on the souls of the living and the dead.