To: G Larry
It’s not rape by fraud, since he got fellated as he wished. He consented to perverse sexual contact, which was perverse whether the fellator was male or female.
51 posted on
12/01/2015 12:53:50 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
("He who sups with the Devil should have a long spoon.")
To: Mrs. Don-o
He did not consent to sex with a man. That is sexual assault.
54 posted on
12/01/2015 12:58:18 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Saying he got what he deserved is like saying a woman got what she deserved if she is raped when she is dressed immodestly. You may disagree with the behavior and/or see it as unwise. That does not mean the person deserves to be violated in any way against their will.
57 posted on
12/01/2015 1:03:16 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Mrs. Don-o
It IS rape by fraud because the performer was male, in which case he would never have consented if he’d known.
Justifiable homicide!
I would!
59 posted on
12/01/2015 1:05:29 PM PST by
G Larry
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Odd that you would invoke the gay agenda that an orgasm is an orgasm and gender doesn’t matter.
60 posted on
12/01/2015 1:07:22 PM PST by
G Larry
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson