Trump can walk and chew gum at the same time. Both can be done simultaneously. I don’t trust Cruz on this issue. I just don’t.
Isn’t it crazy? Essentially, Cruz is saying let’s not enforce a law until we have a means in place that largely prevents people from breaking it in the first place. Is that the approach anywhere else in American jurisprudence? Off the bat, I can’t think of any other examples, although it does remind me a little of the Left’s gun control arguments, which I think everybody here hates with a passion.