The family looks lovely.
But the Goldman Sachs thing seems to take the Clinton Foundation off the table, like Romneycare took Obamacare off the table. I realize they are not the same thing, but that is not how the game is played.
And the plutocrat donors to Cruz are never going to be explained satisfactorily (what - - millions of dollars will have no influence? we should take someone’s word for that?) again taking the Clinton Foundation and Clinton financial corruption off the table.
Some FReeper posted Cruz trying to explain the Goldman Sachs thing. If someone has a link, could you post it again?
To my mind, Cruz responds by looking defensive and weaselly, unlike his usual self-assured and articulate self.
If worse came to worst, one might need to compare the Clinton Foundation situation to Goldman Sachs and see if they are even close to being the same. What do both of these companies back? Who has benefited from what party and how? Who benefits what party and how? Which one better represents mainstream America, if we had to ask? How tightly tied is Mrs. Cruz to Goldman Sachs vs. Hillary Clinton to the Clinton Foundation?
Cruz could stand to be calmer about it, if your description is correct. He’s put his faith in God. Now he will be wise to let it play out.
If Cruz has a problem, it’s been because the face he has let America see is near-perfection. Now potential flaws are being seen and the alabaster saint has a smudge or two. Here’s where a witness to the effect that “Maybe I am not perfect, and maybe the world I have to live in is not perfect, but I serve a perfect God” could have an opportunity.
Geez.
Trump IS a plutocrat.