You are right. It is mentally disturbed people. It’s not guns and it’s not Christians.
However, a priest friend (gay and liberal) posted this on my Facebook page this morning. I am still shaking.
“A good friend and I were talking yesterday that we think it strange the media does not use the term “Christian Terrorist” when reporting about the attack on the Colorado Planned Parenthood location...if he is a Christian. The media screams “Muslim Terrorist” constantly but almost never that Terrorist “A” was/is a Christian...we wondered why. We believe such reporting is unfair and reveals a dark bias. Treat all terrorist exactly the same: report the professed religion of all of them every time or never do it for any. Ones religion is not the issue.”
. . . because the ones the media attribute to being Christians, are only Christian because the media decided they are. The Islamic terrorists identify themselves as Muslim, and proclaim to be doing it in the name of Allah.
Your “priest” friend is a fraud, anyhow.
Besides that, the media are slow to say the words “muslim terrorist”. Where does he get that they scream it? lol!
The question(s) your priest friend must answer are:
Does his religion command him to kill people of other religions ? When whacked out Christians commit crimes, do they always scream out they’re doing this in the name of Christ? Can your friend distinguish the difference between an INDIVIDUAL, committing evil acts, but not attributing the cause to Christ, Buddha, God etc.
This is a problem a great many haven’t been able to grasp. Every religion has sick, disturbed or evil people. But the islamists tell you to do these atrocious acts in the NAME OF ALLAH. That IS their jihad, their command.
“Ones religion is not the issue.â€
Muslim terrorism is performed specifically to advance Islam across the world, sometimes masked as a retaliation for something done to Muslims in the past.
I can only think of one case where a terror act was committed specifically because of Christian ideals, and that would be Erik Rudolph.
A Christian might commit a terror act, but usually not in the very name of Christianity. A Muslim will commit an act of terror because someone else is not following Islam (Ikea beheading), has insulted Islam or Mohammed (Charlie Hebdo), or because some non-Muslim harmed a Muslim somewhere sometime (Boston Marathon bombing, Madrid bombings).
So it does make a difference.
RFK was killed by a Rosicrucian (!) but he did not act in the name of that religion.
It most certainly is. Have you noticed how the most ardent apologists for Islam are non-Muslims?
If he is a sodomite (I do not use the false moniker “gay” - there is nothing “gay” about buggering another man up his corn hole, that is playing in the sewer) then he should not have ever been admitted to the priesthood ... And if he is a liberal, than he is anything but Catholic. Just another modernist heretic poser corrupting the faith and the faithful.
And how often, if ever, do we learn that some “Christian” went on a rampaging murder spree? Muslims do so as a matter of duty prescribed in their so-called “religion.”
Furthermore, this “priest” is absolutely clueless in his grasp of Islamic history, if he believes Islam to be a religion. Islam is NOT a religion; but rather it is an expansionist, militaristic, totalitarian, political ideology having a very thin veneer of religious practice, made specifically for the purpose of deception.
My guess is that your “priest” friend is just another member of the Marxist sodomite cabal who have infiltrated and all but destroyed the Church from within.