I don't either - then again, I'm not an Airbus engineer. From my experience, Airbus jets are the best designed and I prefer flying on them over any other. I cannot imagine that they would design anything without structural integrity,nor would anything without significant structural testing be allowed to fly.
Now would it really save time in boarding? I don't know that either. It would definitely save time and money on cabin re-dos - and planes wouldn't have to be out of service while pods are being re designed or configured. This reduced cost would be of benefit to airlines and to passengers.
Air busted is the best design? You bet. When I see them do a barrel roll with one of theirs then I will begin to believe.
Airbus has significant design errors in their control systems — thus the loss of several aircraft due to computer centric rather than pilot centric designs.
What exactly was that experience? How did you make this determination?