Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exit82
The 14th Amendment does not change the term, and anchor babies are not in the Amendment.

Nothing in the Constitution defines the term either. Rubio is a natural born citizen because he was born here.

21 posted on 11/25/2015 10:44:57 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

DD, these comments are not personally directed at you.

But this is a question I have.

How can a 14th Amendment anchor baby be equivalent to a natural born citizen?

When Rubio was born, what jurisdiction was he subject to?

The United States or Cuba?

Which jurisdiction were his parents subject to?

Natural born has a meaning, and Rubio does not fit it.

He did not even have one American parent.

Being born here makes him a native born citizen, but not a natural born citizen.

As for definitions in the Constitution, the term Letters of Marque is not defined either. But we know the meaning.


22 posted on 11/25/2015 10:53:01 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg
Nothing in the Constitution defines the term either. Rubio is a natural born citizen because he was born here.

After 1868. That's important because that's when men changed the laws of nature.

32 posted on 11/25/2015 2:20:56 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson