Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elhombrelibre
The Pentagon says that while the trucks were being used to support the IS group, the drivers themselves were not thought to be jihadists.

What would constitute "proof"? By these standards US submarines in WW2 could not target merchant ships because the crews were 'civilians' with no proof that they belonged to the NAZI party. It's insane. Besides. You blast a few trucks and either one of 2 things happens: The driver say "scr3w this" and stop hauling, or they continue, in which case you can safely conclude that they are jihadists.

7 posted on 11/24/2015 4:01:09 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
"The truck drivers that run are jihadis. The truck drivers that stand still are well-disciplined jihadis."

8 posted on 11/24/2015 4:06:57 AM PST by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

Obama’s ROE.


14 posted on 11/24/2015 4:28:26 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson