Posted on 11/24/2015 1:49:26 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Your comments do not address Donald Trump’s liberal roots and close association with the Democratic Party leadership.
My question is “has anyone ever seen Liz Mair and Cincinatus’ Wife in the same room?”
Hmmmmm?
That’s it?
Weak.
Apparently, since you can’t give a reasoned, counter-argument, you resort to smear tactics.
Pound away - the table is still standing.
Going by Trump's history, I absolutely believe his time in office won't be conservative.
Trump likes big government.
Nor your liberal roots when you were young and impressionable. We all were at one time.
The perfect question.
Argue? Don't be absurd!
One does not "argue" with a "campaign."
The primary season was designed to give the Establishment lots of opportunities to knock any ‘troublemakers’ down.
The winner take all delegates primaries don’t begin in earnest until March 15th.
Its amazing how much the primaries in the conservative southern states are weighted towards a proportional allocation of delegates with the exception of SC.
Ronald Reagan described the process of keeping the nomination from him in 1976 as ‘the world with its pants down’. It isn’t a pretty notion to consider and I apologize for any offense for what I am about to say.
If they all have to drop their undies to the ground and do it to Trump, they will.
In 1976 one of the operatives who took out Reagan for Ford at the GOP convention was Haley Barbour.
Barbour and his crowd helped take out Chris McDaniel in Mississippi in 2014 in the US Senate primary by bringing out
black Democrats to the polls calling McDaniel a racist.
They will go so low to take out Trump you didn’t know there was such a low.
Calling me a liberal is absurd.
The “dodge” is all you have.
You don't know me too well, do you?
I think it should suffice to say your angsty teenage "you just don't understand what I'm saying," campaign can only be resolved as I always resolve such disagreements; by telling said angsty teenager "I understand what you're saying perfectly, I just don't agree."
Illustrating absurdity with absurdity.
You never addressed my challenge in the first place. All you did was deflect the point by your assumptions based only on what others have to say.
Nothing you said addressed the article - you merely tossed out a bunch of strawmen statements.
The peons have to submit to every stupid law that is on the books from driving the speed limit to taxes. So why is enforcing the law "crazy"?
I’ll take Byron York seriously when he gets a decent haircut.
Besides he should thank Trump for giving him a subject for his latest column.
Chicken!
actually, he explained that appeal just about right.....
It’s obvious that there is nothing you can say, but thanks for bumping the thread.
:: Trump didn’t actually suggest it - the idea came from a reporter with Yahoo News - but he never clearly shot it down ::
Oh! My! Byron, Byron, Byron.
You assert the negative and ask Trump to defend it?
Did you not take “Rhetoric 101” in J-School?
Typing notes to yourself again? Be a big girl and accept the challenge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.