Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: katana
There would seem to be a significant qualitative difference between...

Not if you're talking about transferring private property into the hands of private entities in order to enrich said private entities. If you're okay with the premise, all you're debating is which private enterprises should be the recipients of eminent domain benefits.

38 posted on 11/23/2015 11:00:25 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Canals, roads, highways, military installations, harbor improvements, etc. have all required the legitimate application of eminent domain and just compensation to the property owners for the PUBLIC good. I disagree with it being used to serve the interests of a private interest and, knowing how Atlantic City works, the aroma of public corruption and pay offs.


44 posted on 11/23/2015 11:12:43 AM PST by katana (Just my opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson