However, I find myself watching their non political documentaries and a lot of their news coverage. The propaganda is less heavy handed than NPR, ABC, CBS, NBC etc., etc.
Facts are facts. The Russians and the French can find and destroy ISIS targets. The US can't/won't, take your pick.
ISIS would not exist without the help of one or more governments. They got initial financing and arms from those governments.
Bonus questions:
1. Was Chris Stevens in Benghazi to broker an arms deal to "Syrian rebels (ISIS)"?
2. Was the CIA, with at least two outposts in Benghazi, there to do the same thing?
3. Does anybody care?
I’m inclined to agree with you about Benghazi at least as with regard to supplying “rebels” with arms from Libya. Were those ISIS rebels? That is a tougher question. I don’t know. I’m not sure if there is any proof of that.
As to RT you are probably correct there as well. But I still hear supposedly reliable news sources telling us that the Russians promised to bomb ISIS but they are not doing so. I guess I should have put ‘supposedly’ in ALL CAPS. OTOH, it is nevertheless surprising that we only get the RT input on Russian activities in Syria. Where are the other news services? They should have some real take on what is going on.
This
More bonus questions
Was the Turkish ambassador the last person who met with Chris Stevens before the attack?
Was Stevens involved with or opposed to a plan to smuggle chemical weapons from Libya to turkey to be used by FSA “ moderates” to stage a false flag attack on Syrian civilians to be blamed on Assad to draw the West into the Syrian war? What was the role of the Turkish government?
What was the real objective of the Al Qaeda forces involved in th Benghazi attack?
What was the involvement of the muslim brotherhood and Egyptian leader Morsi?