Ladies and gentlemen, what we have here is a classic case of the left trying to have it both ways. They say that local areas can choose NOT to enforce immigration laws, like through sanctuary cities, but they also say that local areas CANNOT chose TO enforce immigration laws.
You can’t have your falafel and eat it too.
Excellent point.
This has potential.
I’d rephrase that very slightly though I get what you are saying.
I’d say that the left cannot coherently argue that localities have the option to reject Federal law through sanctuary cities while arguing localities do NOT have the option to reject Federal interference through unwanted immigration.
They need to choose which argument they want to lose first.