Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JOHN W K

Ladies and gentlemen, what we have here is a classic case of the left trying to have it both ways. They say that local areas can choose NOT to enforce immigration laws, like through sanctuary cities, but they also say that local areas CANNOT chose TO enforce immigration laws.

You can’t have your falafel and eat it too.


3 posted on 11/21/2015 8:28:23 AM PST by ksm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ksm1

Excellent point.


4 posted on 11/21/2015 8:31:53 AM PST by gettinolder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ksm1

This has potential.


7 posted on 11/21/2015 8:37:31 AM PST by DCmarcher-976453
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ksm1

I’d rephrase that very slightly though I get what you are saying.

I’d say that the left cannot coherently argue that localities have the option to reject Federal law through sanctuary cities while arguing localities do NOT have the option to reject Federal interference through unwanted immigration.

They need to choose which argument they want to lose first.


10 posted on 11/21/2015 8:43:22 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Revenge is a Daesh best served cold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson