There you go again, with your "slaves" strawman. LOL!
I guess I called THAT one.
As we can see from my original response to your Constitution post, I directed our attention to the "or" clause: "involuntary servitude".
I didn't address your fixation with "slavery" other than to mock the red herring.
Are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you really that dense?
Considering that I’ve not been harping about slavery here someone is being a bit dense....
Talking about failure to read - did you even read the headline?