I guess we interpret data and actions differently. I guess Romney would have announced the timetable and pulled out troops. I guess Romney would have had a Secretary of State like a Hillary Clinton. I guess Romney would have not listened to his generals’ advice about prosecuting the war. I guess Romney would have secretly sent weapons that ended up in the hands of Isis. I guess Romney would have signed the nuke deal with Iran and given them 250 billion to fund terrorism. I guess Romney would have traded Bergdahl for the release of terrorists. I guess Romney would have denied increased security for Benghazi and then created the false narrative about a video.
And I guess that this video must have been a fake -—
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/mitt-romney-strategy-to-fight-jihad/
TRANSCRIPT: “It’s this century’s nightmare. Jihadism. Violent, radical, Islamic fundamentalism. Their goal is to unite the world under a single jihadist caliphate. To do that, they must collapse freedom-loving nations like us.
As President, I’ll strengthen our intelligence services. Increase our military by at least 100,000. And monitor the calls al Qaeda makes into America.
And we can and will stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.”
You answer my challenge with this: “If Ryan’s all in on Muslims, Romney won’ be far behind.”
We don’t disagree on what would have been Romney’s RINO domestic agenda. But I have been specifically talking about commander in chief.
Really, Laz? Really? That is the best you have? I guess we will just have to disagree about how the commander in chief and strength of this country as leader of the free world would be different. Keep believing what you choose to believe.
Very well put!!