Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA
Institutionalized three times is indication of something. These days it's almost impossible to get a hospital to keep a person over 48 or so hours, article doesn't say, and It doesn't say whether voluntary or involuntary.

Unstable people should not be allowed to own guns. I'm 100% for stable, responsible people to own them.

We've had one suicide in our family, and it was touch and go if others might be killed. Now other family members have begun stockpiling weapons they didn't have money for before. One is on and off of drugs, has been involuntarily committed but past the five year limit. There are other mental health issues with others involved, not to mention securing them away from small children. In my state, if you pass the five-year mark, you can still own guns but doesn't take the drugs into account.

Because of their irresponsible and dangerous and unpredictable activities, I have broken all ties with them, and informed them of my reasons.

If the man has become as unstable as it sounds, I don't understand how people can support his ownership of that many guns and blame the government. I don't know how to compensate the man for his monetary loss, however.

24 posted on 11/19/2015 6:57:18 AM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aliska

“I don’t know how to compensate the man for his monetary loss, however.”

With money.


34 posted on 11/19/2015 8:31:58 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson