Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Final Harvest

Was not Ishmael an illegal born son?


185 posted on 11/19/2015 3:17:19 AM PST by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Biggirl

No, he was not considered illegal at the time he was born.

People have to put away the customs and laws of TODAY .. and look at what the customs and laws were during the time of the births of Ishmael and Isaac.

And .. we’re talking about Jewish Law .. which was not necessarily the laws of other groups of people.

As I stated clearly in 115, the laws at the time of Ishmael’s birth were totally different from what we have today. Clearly, any slave was the “property” of the family. Therefore, though Ishmael was not CONSIDERED the “first born” (because he was not born of Sarah who was the wife of Abraham - by Covenant Marriage); and this is why Isaac was the child of God’s promise .. and Ishmael could not be the child of promise because his mother was not a part of a Covenant marriage to Abraham. It’s really that simple.

However, Hagar caused her own problems. She did not understand her place “in the family” (primarily because she was not Jewish; she was Egyptian). Ishmael was still a child of Abraham, and he would have had high standing in the family, but he was NOT entitled to the inheritance.

So, you cannot judge Ishmael’s place by the LAWS OF TODAY; that is why you’re trying to say Ishmael was “illegal”. By today’s standard, Ishmael would have been an “illegitimate” child; but during Abraham’s time .. the laws were totally different.


205 posted on 11/19/2015 6:20:41 AM PST by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson