Posted on 11/17/2015 5:33:24 PM PST by markomalley
As dozens of governors voice opposition to resettling Syrian refugees into their states in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris, there is pushback against the concept of states having a say in that process. But federal law does leave room for states to have input, in spite of what some are saying.
The liberal activist group ThinkProgress has a piece entitled “No, State Governors Can’t Refuse To Accept Syrian Refugees,” states:
Just in case there is any doubt, President Obama has explicit statutory authorization to accept foreign refugees into the United States. Under the Refugee Act of 1980, the president may admit refugees who face “persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion” into the United States, and the president’s power to do so is particularly robust if they determine that an “unforeseen emergency refugee situation” such as the Syrian refugee crisis exists.
But the issue is not as cut and dry as progressives would make it seem.
Section 412 (B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states clearly, “With respect to the location of placement of refugees within a State, the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1) shall, consistent with such policies and strategies and to the maximum extent possible, take into account recommendations of the State.”
National Review’s Jim Geraghty also found the following in the Refugee Act of 1980 on the subject of the states’ say on resettlement:
(2)(A) The Director and the Federal agency administering subsection (b)(1), shall consult regularly (not less often than quarterly) with State and local governments and private nonprofit voluntary agencies concerning the sponsorship process and the intended distribution of refugees among the States and localities before their placement in those States and localities.
(B) The Director shall develop and implement, in consultation with representatives of voluntary agencies and State and local governments, policies and strategies for the placement and resettlement of refugees within the United States.
(C) Such policies and strategies, to the extent practicable and except under such unusual circumstances as the Director may recognize, shall-
(i) insure that a refugee is not initially placed or resettled in an area highly impacted (as determined under regulations prescribed by the Director after consultation with such agencies and governments) by the presence of refugees or comparable populations unless the refugee has a spouse, parent, sibling, son, or daughter residing in that area,
(ii) provide for a mechanism whereby representatives of local affiliates of voluntary agencies regularly (not less often than quarterly) meet with representatives of State and local governments to plan and coordinate in advance of their arrival the appropriate placement of refugees among the various States and localities, and
(iii) take into account-
(I) the proportion of refugees and comparable entrants in the population in the area,
(II) the availability of employment opportunities, affordable housing, and public and private resources (including educational, health care, and mental health services) for refugees in the area,
(III) the likelihood of refugees placed in the area becoming self-sufficient and free from long-term dependence on public assistance, and
(IV) the secondary migration of refugees to and from the area that is likely to occur.
In his phone conference he will threaten withdrawal of certain federal funds and they will cave.
SHuT THIS GOVERNMENT DOWN!! NO TERRORIST!! I want obama ground in the dirt over this. These damned Republicrats better listen!! We have the lives of children involved here!! NO TERRORISTS!!!
In Sweden, Muslim refugees, a very small portion of the population, commit 95% of forcible rapes.
Is Obama’s refugee policy a part of his “War on US Women?”
We ought to keep our tax monies at state level and not give to feds. Let the states give the feds money, not the other way around.
This Federal Government? Don’t make me laugh.
Who cares? If I was a governor I’d tell them to pound sand.
Why would a governor, responsible for the saftey of his state, take orders from a lawless administration?
F their damn law. Our founders declared war on England over less than this crap.
Yeah but John Roberts has already ruled the State can mean anything Obama wants it to mean.
It’s too bad once Obama says he’ll shut the government down if he doesn’t get the money for refugees, Mitch McConjob will cave.
So will Paula Ryan, Speaker of BS.
Women of the USA; arm yourselves.
This seems like a great opportunity to invoke the “Levin Plan” as he discussed on his show Monday.
In essence, Levin says “Take a page out of the liberal playbook” and take 0bama to court and keep it going there for the next 15 months. At that point, it won’t matter.
Lester Holt’s program said that it was illegal for States to refuse refugees. Perhaps he should have his journalists get educated in govt. regulations.
The Governor’s should call out the National Guard load them up and transport them straight to DC. Unload them right in front of the WH.
Nothing less is acceptable. Enough of this BS!
“Lester Holt’s program said that it was illegal for States to refuse refugees.”
Has Lester Holt EVER said anything that bojangeles has done was illegal?
Well yeah, of course, Roberts reads it to say that the Federal Government must consult with the state (read Fed Gov.). He sure muddied waters with that nonsense ruling.
It is PAUL RYNO!!
“III) the likelihood of refugees placed in the area becoming self-sufficient and free from long-term dependence on public assistance”
They all go on assistance forever. Most have no job skills. They will never work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.