Skip to comments.
Wave of Governors Say Their States Will Refuse Syrian Refugees
legalinsurrection.com ^
| November 17, 2015
| Sarah Rumpf
Posted on 11/17/2015 11:49:36 AM PST by digger48
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Second, with the 2016 elections rapidly approaching, and so many vulnerable Democrats on the ballot in the states whose Governors want to refuse Syrian refugees, it would not be surprising if Obama got pressure, both openly and behind the scenes, from members of his own party. It is noteworthy that the list of states participating includes both early primary states Iowa and New Hampshire, as well as swing states like Florida and Ohio. This story is, once again, an illustration of the importance of local and state elections. The reason this issue is making news is due in no small part to the increased numbers of Governors who are Republicans. Local elections matter.
1
posted on
11/17/2015 11:49:36 AM PST
by
digger48
To: digger48
No more MUSLIM refugees from ANYWHERE.
2
posted on
11/17/2015 11:51:29 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: digger48
IF ISIS IS CONTAINED THEN THE REFUGEES CAN GO HOME!
3
posted on
11/17/2015 11:52:40 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(IF ISIS IS CONTAINED THEN THE REFUGEES CAN GO HOME!)
To: digger48
There is only ONE solution to this problem. CHARGE ODUNGA WITH TREASON AND REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE. He KNOWS ISIS are among the refugees, AS IT HAS BEEN PROVEN THEY ARE yet he continues to import them. Is this not TREASON? He is in CLEAR violation of his oath of office.
Is the #BlackLivesMatter movement his insurance policy against getting impeached?
To: digger48
5
posted on
11/17/2015 11:55:37 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: digger48
Good exploration of the issue. As with the Planned Parenthood funding, it points out why popular election of senators broke the separation of powers. The federal government is far too powerful and can overpower the states far too easily.
6
posted on
11/17/2015 12:00:55 PM PST
by
FourPeas
("Conservatism's worked every time it's been tried." -Rush)
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
{”There is only ONE solution to this problem. CHARGE ODUNGA WITH TREASON AND REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE”}
Just based on his recent statements about his responsibility as president, or lack thereof, is grounds, not to mention his actions.
If our legislators had a half ball between they would go forward.
7
posted on
11/17/2015 12:02:12 PM PST
by
Calpublican
(Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
To: digger48
Liberals who want to let Muslim refugees into America need to answer two questions:
Why do Muslims, who hate everything about American culture and laws, want to live here?
Will these refugees agree to bake gay wedding cakes and celebrate the gay lifestyle?
8
posted on
11/17/2015 12:05:21 PM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Life is good.)
To: digger48
Declare your state a “Sanctuary State” and tell the feds to go to Hell. Seems to work for the Democrat cities that don’t want to follow federal immigration law.
9
posted on
11/17/2015 12:07:05 PM PST
by
Lawgvr1955
( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: Calpublican
It is a clear violation of the third and tenth Amendments
10
posted on
11/17/2015 12:11:28 PM PST
by
themidnightskulker
(And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
To: digger48
Those who can concealed carry should. Always. Those who cannot carry firearms or have limited boating skills and cannot seem to retain firearms should at least carry a useful pocketknife every day. We should all practice drawing and opening that knife one-handed, or get a new knife that can be opened with one hand (details depend on local knife laws).
The idea that a few thugs with AKs could shoot 100+ innocents in France disgusts me. Once their intent to commit mass murder was clear (or even once they threatened one person), they should have been shooting at a human wave of armed men - wielding knives, clubs, chairs, or even baguettes - but not cowering on the floor while waiting to be shot. Cringing and crying is how democrats die, not how men die. The correct response:
“Let’s roll!”
11
posted on
11/17/2015 12:11:35 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: digger48
Governor Chickenpooper in Colorado said he’d take them all.
12
posted on
11/17/2015 12:19:36 PM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: MrB
And a number of `rat mayors said they were welcome.
What’s the problem? Send them to blue places.
13
posted on
11/17/2015 12:27:47 PM PST
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: themidnightskulker
How does the third amendment apply?
14
posted on
11/17/2015 12:33:03 PM PST
by
Calpublican
(Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
To: MrB
But will stoned Jihadists really ever carry out their attacks or just sit around on the couch all day choomin' ?
15
posted on
11/17/2015 12:33:29 PM PST
by
digger48
To: digger48
As to the question of legality, it’s simple really. As long as sanctuary cities can give immigration law the middle finger, so can these governors do likewise to 0bama vis a vis the refugees.
16
posted on
11/17/2015 12:39:16 PM PST
by
jonrd463
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Is the #BlackLivesMatter movement his insurance policy against getting impeached?That terrorist threat has always been there. It just didn't have a name until a couple of months before the 2104 elections
17
posted on
11/17/2015 12:39:51 PM PST
by
digger48
To: SaxxonWoods
Why do Muslims liberals , who hate everything about American culture and laws, want to live here?
18
posted on
11/17/2015 12:41:31 PM PST
by
digger48
To: SaxxonWoods
ooops..left off part of that..
Why do Muslims liberals , who hate everything about American culture and laws, want to live here?
Fundmental Transformation?
19
posted on
11/17/2015 12:44:11 PM PST
by
digger48
To: Calpublican
” No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Third Amendment
The feds can not force non feds to take and house others against their will.
20
posted on
11/17/2015 12:56:42 PM PST
by
themidnightskulker
(And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson