Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 17th Miss Regt
The Tsar Bomba was scaled back because after about 50-60 MT yield the energy produced would be mostly wasted. It was detonated at about 15,000 feet and the fireball touched the ground and the top of the fireball was at the tropopause. A larger bomb could be built but what is the point? It is a very inefficient use of weapon material.

As an air-burst, yes, most of the energy would go into the upper atmosphere.

Let's say a 100MT bomb detonated on the sea floor. Say, 60 miles offshore from Los Angeles, where Google Earth shows places up to 5,000 feet deep. The tamping effect of the water above it would let a lot of the shock-wave energy go into the shelf.

What would be the effect of that on the San Andreas fault?

51 posted on 11/17/2015 10:47:34 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
What would be the effect of that on the San Andreas fault?

The fault probably would not 'notice' it much at that range. That's a lot of earth and rock to move.

62 posted on 11/17/2015 11:07:54 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson