Watch VIDEO: Muslims around the world CELEBRATE the jihad victory in Paris

http://pamelageller.com/2015/11/watch-video-muslims-around-the-world-celebrate-the-jihad-victory-in-paris.html/ ^ | 11/14/15 | Pamella Geller

[Lera]

Muslims around the world celebrate the Islamic victory in Paris, France. (Video source Jean-Baptiste Kim, thanks to Kenny)

This “celebration” happened in London, UK this afternoon by Pakistani Muslims.

And the wild thing is, all day I have been listening to talking heads and French mourners tell us that this has “nothing to do with religion.” Apologists for savagery, they explain, “They just want to kill.” Uh yes, but if we deny the motive the West is in for a world of pain. This is just the opening salvo.

[papertyger]

Apparently, you ARE too parochial to appreciate the validity of the comparison....

[Fred Nerks]

The Liberal Party is the conservative side...the left call themselves Labor.
Liberal doesn’t have the same connotation in Oz.

http://www.alp.org.au/

http://www.liberal.org.au/

[visualops]

Baloney. Yours is the same attitude that invites the whole multi-culti crapola. Oh they’re only practicing their religion just like Christians. Bull.

[txhurl]

Good stuff!!!!!!

[papertyger]

You are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts. In no way did I advocate for muslims, but if you can’t tell the difference between advocacy and a dispassionate recitation of facts, you are simply a moron.

[SaraJohnson]

They are making a sales pitch to the Demonrat Party there.

[visualops]

dispassionate recitation of facts

HAHAHAHAHAA wow lolol

[drpix]

So you claim the "comparison" of "proselytizes by ministry" and "proselytizes by intimidation" is "valid" and any difference is "immaterial."

Then you must think, a comparison of ringing doorbells to solicit contributions to a push-in robbery is valid - and that the use of nonviolent persuasion versus violence (or the threat of violence) is immaterial?

What would make you post such a patently and utterly foolish remark, is beyond me. No reply is necessary.

[papertyger]

dispassionate recitation of facts HAHAHAHAHAA wow lolol

Now you know why church leadership is reserved to men.....

[papertyger]

So you claim the "comparison" of "proselytizes by ministry" and "proselytizes by intimidation" is "valid" and any difference is "immaterial."

For the purposes of answering the original question, that is "why move to the west if they hate us so much," yes.

it is not my fault, nor problem if you are too dull witted to see past your own inflamed emotions.

I have NOT claimed, nor implied any MORAL equivalence between islam and Christianity, but apparently you're either too histrionic, or too stupid to recognize an ally unless they share your particular mental and emotional deficiencies.

[drpix]

One explanation of the irrationality of the nonsense you post is all I’ll give you. Work on understanding my prior explanation and when you finally understand that everything else will fall in place.

[papertyger]

One explanation of the irrationality of the nonsense you post is all I’ll give you. Work on understanding my prior explanation and when you finally understand that everything else will fall in place.

Apparently you don't know the definition of the word "explanation," either.

[drpix]

If you can’t understand the irrationality of your own comparison even after it’s explained to you, this reply will be a waste of time.

[papertyger]

You offered an explanation, but instead gave a quest of some sort.

Clearly, you’re either addled beyond rationality, or just plain stupid.

Either way, you clearly want “off the hook,” but suffer from enough vanity that you can’t disengage without “saving face.” So I’ll make it easy on you and let my comment so far stand on their own.

[drpix]

“A waste of time”... just as I told you! Goodnight dummy.

[papertyger]

Goodnight, madam.