Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

The Wong Court could also be asked if the Wong ruling itself has withstood the test of time at 117 years without reversal and counting.

If ballot boxes were stuffed, it would have been nice if any of the oppposing political parties or candidates had filed election fraud complaints.

There was never a time in the history of the republic when the media wasn’t biased. At the Founding, it was the federalist media versus the republican media. In the 19th century the many of the major newspapers were wholly owned subsidiaries of the political parties. Today we have corporate media which reflect the views of their owners and major shareholders.


390 posted on 11/17/2015 6:21:52 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
The Wong Court could also be asked if the Wong ruling itself has withstood the test of time at 117 years without reversal and counting.

Given how it has been used to justify anchor babies and birth tourism, I think we can safely say that it hasn't stood the test of time at all well. It has a demonstrable flaw, and in that regard it shares the same position as the Plessy vs Ferguson decision which was made by the same court.

It is very badly flawed because it has been so prone to misinterpretation regarding the children of non-resident aliens acquiring citizenship.

Certainly the case itself is clear on this point with those possessing the wit to read it and understand that it hinges on residency, but for whatever reason, the more accurate understanding seems to escape most legal people who have looked at it.

If ballot boxes were stuffed, it would have been nice if any of the oppposing political parties or candidates had filed election fraud complaints.

They were stuffed in areas under complete Democrat control, and for which witnesses and proof would be completely unavailable.

We only know that they were stuffed by employing some statistical analysis. I.E. situations in which more voters voted than were registered in the county and such.

And yes, our side is ball-less when it comes to fighting Democrat fraud.

There was never a time in the history of the republic when the media wasn’t biased. At the Founding, it was the federalist media versus the republican media. In the 19th century the many of the major newspapers were wholly owned subsidiaries of the political parties.

What you say is true, but took place during a time when all the available media was print, rather than elaborately acted out visual spectacles that bypass the normal analytical portion of the mind and go straight for the emotional/irrational serpent brain.

Modern Media is a highly functional brain washing machine that does not compare at all to reading opinions written down as text and which must be read by people with at least a minimal of cognitive ability.

Modern Television and movies have become an idiot herding system, which due to flaws in our franchise process have now resulted in the very lowest in intelligence, understanding and capability having far too much influence in steering the process towards irrational selections. (Such as Governor Moonbeam in California.)

In other words, the flaw in our voter requirements process, combined with the mind control effectiveness of the visual modern media brainwashing monopoly has resulted in a system that is steering us towards destruction, and will eventually crash our experimental Representative Republic.

Today we have corporate media which reflect the views of their owners and major shareholders.

It is a synergistic feedback loop. Liberal Urban Democrat Union members who are the monopoly of employees in these industries express liberal opinions as the societal norm, and this convinces others that they should hold these opinions as well. They merely accept the underlying premise that "this is the normal position that people should have", and the meme becomes self reinforcing due to the natural herd mentality of people.

Owners and Shareholders are eventually convinced that this is their opinions as well because of the effect of Liberals framing the debate in their favor and convincing vast swaths of the herd with the technological marvel which is their network brainwashing machine.

It is a chaotic system that stabilizes around a position because of artificial strange attractors created by Liberals who control the means of perturbing the system.

They are bending the consensus, which without their tampering, would coalesce around a different attraction point. A normal, non insane attraction point established by nature.

Currently the tail wags the dog.

398 posted on 11/18/2015 7:47:10 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson