Very clever of those "people who did not like the outcome of the election " to have time traveled back to 1817 to concoct their elaborate new definition.
In fact, it looks like they even traveled back to ~1764 when that definition first landed on our continent. (here referred to by James Otis, the man that lit the fires of revolution. Excerpt from his Pamphlet, "The rights of the British Colonies asserted and proved." )
Diabolically clever troublemakers, aren't they?
If I were an Elector, I would not learn anything about my constitutional obligations by reading those two pages. In all your research, have you found any primary sources that an Elector might find determinative?