Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cold Heat
Nothing to say about "being reluctantly willing to settle for a federal government whose violations of the Constitution were the exception rather than, as today, the rule"?

Sure, I can address that...

Maybe you did and I'm not seeing it. My point is that IF we could get to a point where the gravest violation of Constitutional limits was an ad hoc appropriation for certain select destitute war widows, as in 1828, then from the perspective of 2015 we'd be in terrific shape. That level of nearly-Constitutional governance has a much longer pedigree (you mentioned "pre-Depression") and is thus much more reasonable to hope for than the pristine form of the First Congress. (Still far from easy, though.)

254 posted on 11/14/2015 6:00:17 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

That’s true...but everything has a first time. Particularly when your society constantly refers to “They did (it)! Why can’t I” as a rule of conduct, it then follows that [”it”] evolves fairly quickly when looking at a 200 year span.

That same (it) today has no relationship to the 1800 (it).

That (it) and the money it represented then, has grown up to billions of dollars for nearly anything you can imagine and it’s expanded to corporations via crony capitalism.

But like every animal it was born as a little feller....


255 posted on 11/14/2015 11:30:38 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson