Hmmmm.....I had to go though this already today and explain exactly why I have no reason to think that is possible.
If I were younger and more idealistic I would agree with you and did in fact agree at one time..
I am now much older and have experienced much more and as a result of that and American history to guide me as well, I no longer see that option as viable.
I have certainly become what some might call a Constitutional conservative, but that does not mean that I should believe in a premise that I cannot find a way to implement nor see any sequence of events that could result in it's implementation, even over a long period of time.
I suppose it would take Constitutional historian of like mind to better explain this, but I said earlier that you need to destroy the body of law that contains all the precedents and historical cases to prevent a lawyer or group of lawyers from arguing cases using legal precedent or in this case any recorded constitutional precedents.
When a operating system or program in a computer is corrupted over time, what is the recommended fix...???
I suppose it depends on whether you can save the data or not. If data is not a issue, then the best and really only long-term fix that always works is to reformat it, and reinstall the OS.
Most every possible workaround that saves the old OS, will fail again.
So if you appreciate analogies...that's the one.