[ConservingFreedom]

I think it would be foolish to think, or believe that we can at this stage flip it around to a different interpretation of Article 1 in that Congress can only make laws that pertain to the exact wording of the writings pertaining to them in the constitution as originally written.

Flipping it back around to that original Founder-intended interpretation is exactly what an American conservative must support (although not necessarily devote the majority of his effort toward, nor pin his hopes on).

[Cold Heat]

I would be in favor of it, if it occurred, but if it occurred it would be the result of the failure and fall of the US government.

So in view of that, the idea that it could be changed, is not real.

Which is why I use the term ...reality quite a bit.

It’s better than using fantasy.

[ConservingFreedom]

Flipping it back around to that original Founder-intended interpretation is exactly what an American conservative must support

While being reluctantly willing to settle for a federal government whose violations of the Constitution were the exception rather than, as today, the rule.