Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H

Well......you could be right..

I used essentially the same logic when I formulated my position on gay marriage. I said that I would accept civil unions but not marriage or sanctified matrimony.

As you can see, I gave them a inch and they took a mile.

Same thing here probably...I really don’t seriously give a damn. I already have said in my posts on this topic that the country has already gone off the deep end. It just has not hit the bottom yet.

But it will, because it must.

I just buy more ammo when I get pissed.


134 posted on 11/11/2015 8:59:39 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
I used essentially the same logic when I formulated my position on gay marriage.

You got it entirely backwards. Fedgov has told states that MJ must be illegal, and that gay marriage must be legal. Both actions violate the Tenth Amendment.

States already told fedgov to get stuffed with respect to MJ, and there is beginning to be some pushback on the gay marriage front, as there should be.

So are you ready to discuss the Tenth Amendment aspects of MJ, or do you have that Amendment on permanent avoidance?

135 posted on 11/11/2015 11:32:04 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson