To: Navy Patriot
Do we want Russia to nuke ISIS
Not that I would mind... I am more worried about the casual use of NUKES
4 posted on
11/11/2015 9:13:14 AM PST by
Mr. K
(If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
To: Mr. K
Wonder if Russia has any neutron warheads in stock? I’d bet a gross or so would turn the trick...
5 posted on
11/11/2015 9:17:59 AM PST by
W.
(I piss fire and acid upon the militant muslims as they pray to their baby-raping god!)
To: Mr. K
There are non-nuke alternatives that are as potent.
Fuel-air bombs, for example.
6 posted on
11/11/2015 9:18:23 AM PST by
Lazamataz
( If they try firearm confiscation or gun registration, I go ballistic.)
To: Mr. K
I’m not certain that wiping out 30-50,000 ISIS fighters concentrated in a few places constitutes “large scale”. I’d say about 12 Bear bombers fully loaded with dumb bombs and modern targeting systems ought to take care of the problem.
I read that one fully loaded B-52 (comparable to a Bear) could completely obliterate one square mile so that two bricks wouldn’t be stuck together and no mammal larger than a field mouse could survive above ground.
8 posted on
11/11/2015 9:20:45 AM PST by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
To: Mr. K
Not that I would mind... I am more worried about the casual use of NUKES
Me too. Once that cat is out of the bag there is nothing but terror in store for modern civilization.
24 posted on
11/11/2015 9:42:48 AM PST by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson