Well I know that’s what Cruz meant but he ended up arguing with Kasich over a completely erroneous point.
The questioner was the first to equate letting a bank collapse with ruining its customers. This isn’t the case because depositors are protected by FDIC. Cruz didn’t disagree with this faulty premise.
Then Kasich jumped in defending the idea of bailing out a bank because “you have to protect the customersâ€, the same mistake that the questioner and Cruz had both made.
None of them knew what they were talking about.
Fair enough. I think the candidates pre-load their points so much before these things that they often grab the subject line vs the specifics.
Carson is muddling through this now with Cavuto one on one.
The bigger surprise is that Cavuto doesn’t know the difference. I doubt that he is purposely asking a question that he knows is based upon a faulty premise.
But once again Free Republic is ahead of the so called experts...