[Bob434]

The destruction of the temple was predicted in Mark 13:2, Matthew 24:2, and Luke 21:6

“Some of his disciples were remarking about how the temple was adorned with beautiful stones and with gifts dedicated to God. But Jesus said, ‘As for what you see here, the time will come when not one stone will be left on another; every one of them will be thrown down.’”

But in order to prove the gospels were written after the fall of temple, scholars have to concoct a story that Jesus never said or predicted this event, and claiming that the apostles later claimed Jesus said these things- essentially lying about the event

So TBP when you say Scholars who doubt that the bible is accurate are objective, this is simply not true- when they have to invent a scenario to claim Jesus never said what he said in order to uphold their hypothesis, then clearly they are not objective and are creating facts to make the puzzle pieces of their hypothesis fit

[tjd1454]

So TBP when you say Scholars who doubt that the bible is accurate are objective, this is simply not true- when they have to invent a scenario to claim Jesus never said what he said in order to uphold their hypothesis, then clearly they are not objective and are creating facts to make the puzzle pieces of their hypothesis fit

Good point - the skeptics have to create a scenario that fits with their rejection of the possibility of predictive prophecy, so of course the "prophecy" must have been written after the fact!