I tend to think that because of the Destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70, that those who believe in earlier dates for most (all?) of the NT are correct.
Otherwise, the gospel writers would make a VERY big deal out of Jesus’ prediction of Jerusalem’s fall coming true.
Makes sense to me, anyway.
I concur. Odd that one of the reasons the “scholars” argue for a late date is because of the temples destruction, which they reason was looking backward at a past event, but deceptively portrayed as a prophecy of Jesus. Fits with their patent denial of the possibility of miracles, prophecy, and most importantly, the resurrection.