Obama will veto and there is no way to get 67 votes to override it. Yes, it’s worth the effort. The future will prove they are indeed a terrorist organization and that Obama (and Hillary) were complicit.
A Major finding if upheld of Treason agaist both. (IMM)
I hope the Republican majority will at least produce a bill that lands on Obama’s desk which he will then be forced to veto.
If they can do just that much. There was once hope that the new majority would send a storm of bills to the WH that POTUS would veto-veto-veto-veto-veto & thus look like the real troublemaker.
Oh, well.
“Obama will veto and there is no way to get 67 votes to override it. Yes, it’s worth the effort. The future will prove they are indeed a terrorist organization and that Obama (and Hillary) were complicit.”
This is how you fight. It brings it to the forefront for discussion. It makes the Dems/media defend the indefensible.
Ted is a fighter.
Identify the enemy within once and for all.
Future history does us little good today. OF COURSE the Current Occupant and Herself were fully complicit in the present state of affairs, with the various branches of Islam being the source of virtually all the terrorism in the world today. But we are reduced to depending on Russia to prop up a “moderate” form of Islam (Alawites) as the holding action against the more radical affiliates and franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, while embracing the Qods Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran, representing the Shi’ite branch of Islam.
Herself and the Current Occupant have tied their fortunes to the elevation of the Muslim Brotherhood to some degree of legitimacy. Therefore, they MUST support ISIS, however discreetly.
Something like trying to apply a Shinola spit-shine to a piece of fecal matter.
And it also brings attention to the issue today for the lofos.
Is there a way for Congress or the USSC to overturn a Presidential pardon?