Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: SeekAndFind
The problem with socialists...their economic analyses are static.
27 posted on
11/01/2015 6:19:49 AM PST by
Redleg Duke
(The Federal Government is nothing but a welfare program with a dress code!)
To: SeekAndFind
"The Democratic candidates have acknowledged this and have called for high-end tax increases, while keeping proposed tax cuts targeted on low- or middle-income Americans. They have also called for new taxes on financial transactions. Most important, their tax plans are part of broader economic proposals to raise wages, including support for a higher minimum wage, unions, expanded profit-sharing and employee ownership. "
So higher taxes will raise wages...got it
28 posted on
11/01/2015 6:21:37 AM PST by
God luvs America
(63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
To: SeekAndFind
Like anyone believes the math of the NYT...or anything else.
Hello.....they are journalism majors......
To: SeekAndFind
All of these candidates deny fiscal reality. In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even... Then let's not keep federal spending even.
-PJ
32 posted on
11/01/2015 6:31:19 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: SeekAndFind
The NYT has a history of being wrong on so many things.....
33 posted on
11/01/2015 6:33:13 AM PST by
The_Media_never_lie
(The Bush family needs to just go away. The Clinton family needs just to go to prison.)
To: SeekAndFind
100 percent tax would not be enough for the present runaway government.
34 posted on
11/01/2015 6:39:12 AM PST by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: SeekAndFind
In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even, per capita, with inflation and population growth. If this is the fiscal program advocated by the New York Times (and by extension Progressives of all stripes), one can quite readily understand why the Republicans are looking for an alternative.
35 posted on
11/01/2015 6:41:00 AM PST by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: SeekAndFind
The New York Slime says the new tax plans won’t work.
Then where, dear Editor-in-Chief of the NYT, is YOUR proposed tax plan?
To: SeekAndFind
40 posted on
11/01/2015 6:57:19 AM PST by
Timber Rattler
("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
To: SeekAndFind
When money gets tight in our house we don’t spend as much. Seems to work nicely.
Why do they always approach it from the view that spending can NEVER be cut?
43 posted on
11/01/2015 7:20:48 AM PST by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking.)
To: SeekAndFind
In the next 10 years, revenues will need to increase by 40 percent simply to keep federal spending even, per capita, with inflation and population growth Why don't we just give them every cent we earn, and they can give us cheese, rice and federal housing apartments.
Oh wait, that's the Democratic Party's plan.
46 posted on
11/01/2015 7:36:03 AM PST by
dead
("I'm up to my eyeball in virgin goats!" - Mullah Omar)
To: SeekAndFind
LOL! The toads down at the NYT are now tax plan experts. No wonder the country is so screwed up.
47 posted on
11/01/2015 7:39:54 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Have you ever noticed that we don't have a "Battle Hymm of the Democracy"?)
To: SeekAndFind
Once again the assumption is the government has first right to the earnings of the serfs...
48 posted on
11/01/2015 7:53:22 AM PST by
BlueNgold
(May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
To: SeekAndFind
Why would journalists know more about tax plans than the economists who developed them? This is where this country got off-track, thinking anyone with a megaphone is all-knowing.
They’re lawyers and journalists! They know squat about running a country except how to find ‘expert witnesses’ to put on the stand for their viewpoint.
50 posted on
11/01/2015 12:40:24 PM PST by
Kenny
(RED)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson