[Mastador1]

I seem to recall that just because a property has Trump’s name on it does not mean that he has any control over the policies. In a number of cases he gave up the actual ownership of several properties that still display his name.

[tanknetter]

I seem to recall that just because a property has Trump’s name on it does not mean that he has any control over the policies. In a number of cases he gave up the actual ownership of several properties that still display his name.

True. But even for properties he still owns and controls it's going to be a MUCH more complicated matter than the MSM would have us believe.

The availability and cost of liability insurance certainly plays a role. Recall that gun liability insurance is one of the ways the Left wants to use to implement strict gun control - mandate that people have insurance for their guns, then let the big insurance companies use draconian rules to make gun ownership unaffordable. Since its a "free market" matter between owners and their insurance carriers, the Left gets what they want without the messy overhead of political blame.

I know several small business owners who have told me that their insurance policies forbid firearms on premises, as a non-negotiable requirement to hold that insurance. They get caught "permitting" firearms on-site and they not only lose their insurance, but no other carrier will give them a policy. Which will drive them out of business.