To: WTFOVR
This New York Appeals Court Ruling suffers from idiocy. How can a 6 day old baby NOT be a person? Impossible! Take this to the Supreme Court.
3 posted on
10/31/2015 4:29:24 PM PDT by
Chgogal
(Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
To: Chgogal
From the comments section ...
Jorgensen is no longer being held accountable for her baby’s death because, in the eyes of the state, her unborn daughter did not have the rights of personhood when her reckless behavior fatally injured her child.
13 posted on
10/31/2015 4:40:09 PM PDT by
sparklite2
(All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
To: Chgogal
The whole point of Dred Scott was that black people were declared non-persons...
14 posted on
10/31/2015 4:42:56 PM PDT by
D Rider
To: Chgogal
More and more I hate this country and my fellow countrymen
20 posted on
10/31/2015 4:55:49 PM PDT by
Stand W
("Gentlemen! You can't fight in here! This is the WAR ROOM!")
To: Chgogal
Take this to the Supreme Court.You sure about that?
57 posted on
10/31/2015 6:32:43 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: Chgogal
This New York Appeals Court Ruling suffers from idiocy. How can a 6 day old baby NOT be a person?When the judge is a democrat
59 posted on
10/31/2015 6:35:28 PM PDT by
llevrok
(To liberals, Treason Is the New Patriotism)
To: Chgogal
There was definitely some un-human-ness on exhibit here. On the part of the judges.
I am reminded of CS Lewis’ “Perelandra” story wherein the bad guy becomes such a willing vassal of Satan the hero begins referring to him as “the un-man.” No one is beyond the redemptive power of The Word except for someone who willing refuses it.
75 posted on
11/01/2015 5:12:18 AM PST by
crusher
(GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson