Replies

I happen to agree that the woman should not be convicted of a crime against her unborn child. The reasoning is insane, why not just have the common sense to not charge her for the loss of her child.

22 posted on 10/31/2015 4:57:36 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts (If God himself said every 50 years debt should be erased, and land returned, who am I to disagree?)

WTF are you talking about??? You are Agreeing with the Judge?

24 posted on 10/31/2015 5:03:18 PM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

There is precedence:

http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/20/man-found-guilty-of-killing-his-pregnant-girlfriend-and-her-13-week-old-unborn-baby/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/09/21/woman-convicted-of-murder-after-slicing-out-an-unborn-baby-from-a-pregnant-womans-womb/

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/12/17/apple-valley-man-convicted-of-murdering-wife-unborn-child/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/tenn-man-charged-2011-murder-woman-unborn-child-article-1.1792607

http://abcnews.go.com/US/murder-pregnant-woman-fetus-bring-death-penalty/story?id=21412398

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unborn_Victims_of_Violence_Act

29 posted on 10/31/2015 5:14:39 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)