Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theo; gogeo
Don’t you mean “The Cruz Effect”? Ted Cruz is the one who initially called out the moderators, not Trump.

You're right and Cruz was unbelievably good!

However, how Trump has changed this is he brings ratings. If he sits out a debate the ad revenue is nothing. If Cruz sat out a debate all the rino's would try to take advantage of it and go ahead with the debate.

What I'm hoping for is some good business sense gets interjected. The top 6 candidates should do the debates themselves, buy the TV time, sell the ads and split the profits or give them to charities. Shift the power away from the party and "objective moderators".

78 posted on 10/30/2015 11:00:59 AM PDT by wmfights (a stranger in a hostile and foreign land that used to be my home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights

The idea I saw floated was for two debates, with seven randomly selected candidates in each. Strikes me as a weak platform, but the leading candidate need the lower ranking ones united with them in a show of solidarity against the RNC.


84 posted on 10/30/2015 11:06:11 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson