Jeb Bush donors try to make sense of Wednesday night

CNN ^ | 10/29/15 | Theodore Schleifer and Ashley Killough,

[jimbo123]

Jeb Bush's reviews from Wednesday night's debate were universally poor. But the power players -- at least on the record -- say it's not time to turn out the lights yet, insisting that debates aren't Bush's strong suit anyway, and pointing to other factors such as the CNBC moderators and the high hopes and expectations coming in.

The Republican debate had the potential to re-energize Jeb Bush's floundering presidential campaign, injecting it with optimism after deep spending cuts and continuing low poll numbers.

Instead, Bush's fundraisers and backers were left trying to explain why the man they had poured so many dollars into still proved to be such a weak candidate, delivering what was widely seen as a meek and ineffective performance in Boulder, Colorado.

[LibertarianLiz]

a meek and ineffective performance in Boulder, Colorado.

I think every debate performance by Bush has been "meek and ineffective".

[JediJones]

I thought his performance was very effective at totally disqualifying himself. He came in dead last in Drudge’s poll. Money can’t buy results like that.

[JediJones]

Regulate fantasy football?

FUJB!