Replies

I debunked Willard the sociopath/megalomaniac/pathological liar and his little dog and pony show a long time ago. He is part of the large and substantial group of elites in this country that are bringing us to absolute destruction.

BE makes his arguments for what he believes Willard to be. As one whose family has been chin-deep in the infanticide movement that has seen 50-60 million (perhaps more) unborn never have their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness affirmed (since Roe, and even before), to equate him & his family to great monsters in history may not be as hyperbolic as you believe it to be. What makes it worse is that they believe it is morally acceptable, just as many deranged souls today believe sexual degeneracy is thoroughly “normal” and equivalent to normal sexual practices.

Willard, of course, had the unmitigated nerve (hubris, or just part of his sociopathic profile of being a pathological liar as most of the left tends to be) of claiming to be pro-life, and in an attempt to proclaim such a “conversion”, paid off people and groups to buy him legitimacy. Words for someone like that I cannot openly use on our family friendly website.

What I don’t fathom, again, is how after knowing all of this, after his thorough exposure and debunking, that anyone on this website that claims even the most remote support for Conservatism, could defend this individual in any manner and claim acceptability for him to serve in the highest office (especially given that he wasn’t even running to win — believe me, if he had WANTED to win, he had every weapon in his arsenal available to a man with no sense of morality or decency, to have obliterated Zero if he so chose. But those weapons, he knows, are only available for use on his Conservative opposition, not on his fellow friendly leftists. It was the exact same with McQueeg).