Replies

The one and only assertion in your post that passes the smell test was your analogy of FDR allying with Stalin against Hitler to squishballs posing as conservatives and patriots voting for the Stalin equivalent of Willard Mitt Romney. Each was a sellout of monumental proportions. In each case, the enemy was truly reprehensible and in each case the "ally" was equally reprehensible.

Is it your position that Romney was every bit as morally reprehensible as Stalin? Just want to clarify that.

It could be demonstrated that Romney loves this country????? No, it cannot because he does not, like his execrable daddy and mommy before him. What convinced you? Was it his heroic service in Viet Nam? Oh, that's right, he served in Paris dodging the draft as a "missionary." which is something he could have done AFTER military service. Parisian cuisine beats K-rations anytime, right? Was it his steadfast protection of the jobs of American workers? Oh, that's right he is a major broker of jobs to places like Bangladesh and the mere middle class and working class who actually fight and die in our wars and for our country, unlike anything named Romney, be da*ned so long as Muffie's trust fund is fattened by resulting "profits" from impoverishing his fellow Americans.

David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett could not have written a more stinging denunciation. Kudos to you.

Well, he is a member (and to their shame an elite member) of the Church of Latter Day Saints. He must be pro-life and pro-marriage as a bishop of that church, right? Oh no, Willard got a pass from church leadership (to their everlasting shame) on both publicly funded abortion on demand and perversion posing as marriage of the fudgepackers. I wrote this paragraph as one who has often defended the LDS here and I am a Catholic. LDS has a tremendous number of wonderful decent people who are among the most personally moral in our nation, but NOT anyone in clan Romney. I disagree with their theology but admire their morality based on Mormons I have known.

"The Constitution specifies there shall be no religious test for public office, and I'm a Constitutionalist"
~ Senator Ted Cruz, September 2015.

And such an unConstitutional 'test' would apply to either an entire religious denomination, or to one individual from that denomination as you would apply it.

Just as Kerry, Pelosi, the late Kennedy the Last (hopefully although his son and namesake has been elected to Connecticut's State Senate), Rosa DeLauro, Patty Murray and so many, many others ought to be summarily excommunicated publicly by their respective bishops, so Romney should be cast in the outer darkness and excommunicated by LDS.

Well take it up with the LDS then. You're preaching to the choir and that takes no courage at all.

Oh, so Romney called Putin and Russia our adversary? Be still my beating heart over his extraordinary courage in giving you the tiniest of fig leaves. If he were POTUS, the POS would have done absolutely NOTHING but conclude new trade deals with Putin so that American donor class of corrupt greedocrats like himself could get their piece of the Russian slave labor market.

Did you obtain that insight into some parallel future timeline by communing with familiar spirits, using your tarot cards, pendulum or the always trusty Magic 8-Ball(c)? You are making an assertion not supported by any facts.

And finally, hindsight has nothing to do with it. Finny and Norm Lenhart and I and many others here were quite explicit that we were not voting as you did for the single sorriest excuse for a GOP candidate in party history.

Hindsight has EVERYTHING to do with it. You had the right to waste your vote on a candidate that had no chance in Hell to unseat Obama, and you did so. Bully for you. Your fellow FReepers who chose to cast their vote for the only candidate that DID have a chance to end the Obamunist regime did so not to betray the holiness of absolutely pure conservatism, but to try and stop the 4 years of national destruction that was taking place by Obama's direction, and to prevent another term of it. We had a flawed and imperfect candidate, but that was the only candidate who had a realistic chance of prevailing. By your logic, every conservative should have stayed home on election day, refused to participate, and who knows? Obama and Biden might have ended up with a 50 state landslide and a 'mandate' for even more horrific 'hope and change' and wouldn't you feel good about that?

As you can see from this year's debates, the GOP-E may have learned their lesson in POTUS nominations and El Jebbie is going nowhere but home to Florida. Money can't buy him votes as it did for Romney in the halls of blind party first voting in "GOP" primaries. Next up to be purged: Ryano, McConnell, McCarthy, Cornyn, Corker, LAMAR!!!, Cockroach and their ilk. The we can concentrate on those who are flat out liars when posing as "conservative." Get used to it! Rule or ruin!

Jebuardo and the rest of the GOPe Axis of Oafs are fully deserving of the political fate that appears to be awaiting them, you'll get no arguments from me about that. But as you and your fellow Defenders of the Conservative Faith prepare for your upcoming purge and pogrom, take a moment to study some history, and consider how many innocent people were swept up in those Stalinist purges in the old Soviet Union, sent off to the gulags, tortured or executed, all because some party apparatchik made the subjective decision that they were not 'Communist' enough.

Trotsky got a pickaxe to his skull. What do you have planned for those who don't measure up to your conservative standards?

And such an unConstitutional 'test' would apply to either an entire religious denomination, or to one individual from that denomination as you would apply it.

A common misunderstanding.

The constitutional prohibition on a religious test for public office is a governmental one.

Individual citizens retain their full right to reject or accept any candidate for public office based on absolutely anything they damn well please.

Stalin was a relatively honest communist monster and Willard has never talked politics in his life without lying. His path and Stalin's both lead to the gulag for decent people. With Stalin though, what you saw was what you got. Consider it clarified.

Stinging denunciation? Nothing that Willard has not earned in spades. However, Axelrod and Jarrett are truly professional communist apparatchiks. I like to think myself their opposite but professional critic and Willard's.

Other than most voters, no one said that Willard COULD NOT BE POTUS for religious reasons or any others. By the way, I would never vote FOR a Wahabbi Muslim for public office. Would you?

Hmmmm! You mean I get to apply the final solution as to Lev Trotsky to the despicable treasonweasels of the GOP-E and their trusty sycophants? Where do I sign up?