[LMAO]

To repeat your statement again
“Anything he’s said in the past is irrelevant to what he’s running on now. What he’s saying now are the “terms of the deal” he’s making with the American people.””

This is the most troubling statement I've read from a Trumpamaniac. Based on this, you probabaly weren't troubled by BHO past associates or the church he attended or the fact that at one time he referred to the Constitution as a document of negative liberties. That's all irrelevant, right? What only mattered what he was saying to the people in 2008.Except you see the results now that he's gotten past elections

[papertyger]

This is the most troubling statement I've read from a Trumpamaniac. Based on this, you probabaly weren't troubled by BHO past associates or the church he attended or the fact that at one time he referred to the Constitution as a document of negative liberties.

Well I'll give you this regarding your other reply: you certainly demonstrate the first part of your descriptor.

That you lack the acuity to distinguish the difference in evaluating a professional pol, and a magnate with the acumen, resources, and persona to viably contend for the highest elective office in the world as his first foray into politics is hardly a credible qualification for evaluating my naiveté.

However, it does make your disdain for those asymmetrically shaped checkers on the board, eminently understandable.