Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GailA

Ah, the time when govt didn’t reach into EVERY aspect of ones’ lives and wallet.

Where one head of household could earn enough to: support the family, buy a car, have a TV, save for college, go on vacation, save for retirement, have spending $$, etc. etc. etc.

As those in my age group (40’s) or younger a simple question: Why can you NOT have children where one of you stays home to raise, but instead ‘pawn off’ into daycare , pay $1000+/mo, etc.?

I HIGHLY doubt govt would come to mind....or it would take MANY minutes to formulate that train of thought: work => $$ => taxes => govt => less $$


17 posted on 10/27/2015 4:58:33 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

” Local school districts in New Hampshire that are working to both ensure proper nutrition for———”Ayotte said in a statement.

++

I remember the days when schools were responsible for education and parents were responsible for nutrition.

Now that seems to be a radical idea.

.


19 posted on 10/27/2015 8:37:21 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson