> “I understand full well that you think Trump wins simply because of his message.”
Sorry, but I don’t believe you. I don’t believe you understand much of anything, although I’m sure you will badger anyone willing to listen including a street lamp post that you understand everything fully.
> “But the point of this article is that ....”
There is no point to the article. It is a hit job, one of hundreds and hundreds that continuously fail. All of it fails because the underlying message remains crystal clear.
**************************************
Donald Trump is like Babe Ruth at bat.
The media is like a pitcher rubbing spit onto the ball in preparation for throwing the pitch.
Donald swings and misses and the fans of the opposing team go crazy. Another pitch is thrown and another swing and miss. The opposing fans are dancing in the aisles.
Trump’s fans remain calm in their seats with the silent satisfaction of knowing that their hero is the best there is.
Next pitch is hit long long over the fence.
Media had their little spot of euphoric bliss, but it did not matter. The underlying power of the message overwhelmed them.
If the media and their sycophants on chat boards want to win, they have to produce a champion whose message resonates more powerfully than that of Donald Trump’s. They can’t do it.
Don’t know how to make any clearer than that.
The article is a "hit job" because it points out that Trump falsely claimed credit for something that never happened. And you didn't seem to think there was "no point" when you also credited Trump for Ford's decision. It was only AFTER I (and others) pointed out that Ford had not scrapped the 2.5B plant that, suddenly, it no longer mattered whether Ford had scrapped the plant.
But keep spinning and insulting. It's what you people do best.