Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dware

“The DOJ letter sent Friday said Lerner used “poor judgment” in using her IRS email account to send personal messages voicing “political views,” but said they found no evidence that she exercised her official authority at the IRS in a “partisan manner generally” or that political views influenced her actions with regard to the tax-exempt applications.”

Amazing that they can get away with that. Yes, she expressed her political views with her IRS email—and then consistent with those views systematically squelched the tax-exempt applications of those she disagreed with. But somehow she didn’t act in a “partisan manner generally”? Like maybe there was nothing pro-Obama about how she turned her computer on in the morning?

And what kind of a standard is that? “Yes, she’s guilty, but she wasn’t always doing guilty things, so we won’t charge her.”


111 posted on 10/23/2015 4:12:41 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

You have to enter their warped mind to understand. They disagreed with the supreme court decision and because they are all knowing Gods they decided to use their federal positions to deny tax exempt status to organizations that support civil rights they disagree with. You see not all civil rights are civil rights. Only their definition of civil rights count.The remaining civil rights are “special interests” and evil.


113 posted on 10/23/2015 4:24:10 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson