Wrong. Quarantines are necessary and important in times of dangerous disease.
Scientifically-based quarantines that are relevant tot he transmissibility of a dangerous disease are necessary and important.
Quarantines (like this one) that go against the science, and are used instead to score political points based on fear, are unnecessary and counterproductive.
Quarantines are necessary when a person has some sort of symptom being presented. She didn’t.
And if all it takes to void your rights is to suggest that you *might* have been exposed to something then we don’t really have any rights, do we?