It’s not hindsight. At the time, all of the medical and infectious disease control experts were saying the same thing (and I was agreeing with them then, too) - that ebola is not transmittable in the absence of symptoms, so there is no reason to impose a blanket quarantine like Christie (and Cuomo) tried to do.
And you continue, then, to ignore everything linked that shows there was cause for concern dye to them NOT knowing everything there is about Ebola.
How it can be spread sexually, how it doesn’t present fever in some, etc.
And yes, it is hindsight.
So, would you have been defending her still if she did indeed have and spread Ebola?
Answer the question.