Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Why would I hire somebody who is still beholden to their previous employer?


8 posted on 10/22/2015 7:13:15 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

They probably put a 2 year NON-COMPETE clause in the severance agreement as well.


11 posted on 10/22/2015 7:14:38 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Will Hillary's testimony on Benghazi be under oath? Baseball players were tried for perjury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
-- Why would I hire somebody who is still beholden to their previous employer? --

You wouldn't - although I get the impression these soon-to-be-ex employees are far from beholden to SunTrust.

The article, especially remarks provided by SunTrust, implies that calls are only made when the situation is litigation or akin to litigation, and that the workers probably wouldn't be called. Assuming that is accurate, the "not for pay" proviso is ham-handed.

The article doesn't describe the severance package as a whole. It might be generous to the extent that being available for say 5 hours in two years is a nothing-burger.

21 posted on 10/22/2015 7:21:52 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

Exactly. This can prevent them from taking other employment. Which could be what the original employer wants, so that no skills get transferred to a new company.


63 posted on 10/22/2015 8:35:49 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson