Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Labyrinthos

via telephone - they never would have been able to contact me...


4 posted on 10/21/2015 6:02:52 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: glorgau

Yep! These polls are going to be more and more off if they keep using antiquated technology! ;-)

No seriously! landlines are pretty much gone. Cellphones made area codes irrelevant. Phone polls will be further and further off in the coming years!


18 posted on 10/21/2015 7:00:54 AM PDT by the_boy_who_got_lost (I am for Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: glorgau; Pollster1

Here are the problems with the poll:

1. The poll is registered voters, not likely voters.

2. The poll has a sample of 1012 registered voters, but the results are based upon a sub-sample of only 348 registered voters, and only 262 of that sub-sample identified as republicans.

3. The margin of error among subsets of the sub-sample is significantly higher than the overall margin of error of 5.3% for the sub-sample as a whole. (This should send up red flags.)

4. The 5.3% margin of error really means there is a 95% chance that the poll results are accurate within a 10.6% spread and a 5% chance that the poll results are completely screwed up (as opposed to merely suspect). In other words, the margin of error for this poll is 32.5% greater than a poll with a more typical 4% margin of error, and 76.7% greater than a poll with a 3% margin of error.


20 posted on 10/21/2015 7:34:05 AM PDT by Labyrinthos (Registered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson